Periodontal therapeutics: Current host‐modulation agents and future directions

LM Golub, HM Lee - Periodontology 2000, 2020 - Wiley Online Library
LM Golub, HM Lee
Periodontology 2000, 2020Wiley Online Library
With the recognition in the 1960s and 1970s of the periodontopathic importance of the
microbial biofilm and its specific anaerobic microorganisms, periodontitis was treated as an
infectious disease (more recently, as a dysbiosis). Subsequently, in the 1980s, host‐
response mechanisms were identified as the mediators of the destruction of the collagen‐
rich periodontal tissues (gingiva, periodontal ligament, alveolar bone), and the
periodontopathogens were now regarded as the" trigger" of the inflammatory/collagenolytic …
Abstract
 With the recognition in the 1960s and 1970s of the periodontopathic importance of the microbial biofilm and its specific anaerobic microorganisms, periodontitis was treated as an infectious disease (more recently, as a dysbiosis). Subsequently, in the 1980s, host‐response mechanisms were identified as the mediators of the destruction of the collagen‐rich periodontal tissues (gingiva, periodontal ligament, alveolar bone), and the periodontopathogens were now regarded as the "trigger" of the inflammatory/collagenolytic response that characterizes actively destructive periodontitis. Also at this time a new pharmacologic strategy emerged, entitled "host‐modulation therapy", based on 2 major findings: (1) that the ability of tetracycline antibiotics to inhibit periodontal breakdown was due (in large part) to their previously unrecognized ability to inhibit the host‐derived matrix metalloproteinases (notably, the collagenases, gelatinases, macrophage metalloelastase), and by mechanisms unrelated to the antimicrobial properties of these medications; and (2) that nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, such as flurbiprofen, again by nonantimicrobial mechanisms, could reduce the severity of periodontitis (however, the adverse effects of long‐term therapy precluded their development as safe and effective host‐modulatory agents). Additional mechanistic studies resulted in the development of novel nonantimicrobial formulations (Periostat® [now generic] and Oracea®) and compositions of tetracyclines (notably chemically modified tetracycline‐3) as host‐modulator drugs for periodontitis, arthritis, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, cancer, and, more recently, for local and systemic bone loss in postmenopausal women. Identification of the cation‐binding active site in the tetraphenolic chemically modified tetracycline molecules drove the development of a new category of matrix metalloproteinase‐inhibitor compounds, with a similar active site, the biphenolic chemically modified curcumins. A lead compound, chemically modified curcumin 2.24, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in vitro, in cell culture, and in vivo in mouse, rat, rabbit, and dog models of disease. In conclusion, novel host‐modulation compounds have shown significant promise as adjuncts to traditional local therapy in the clinical management of periodontal disease; appear to reduce systemic complications of this all‐too‐common "inflammatory/collagenolytic" disease; and Oracea® is now commonly prescribed for inflammatory dermatologic diseases.
Wiley Online Library